Go Back   ATVConnection.com ATV Enthusiast Community » Brand Discussions Area » Polaris
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Welcome to ATVConnection Forums!
Welcome to ATVConnection.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the ATVConnection Forums community today!


Reply Share this with your friends
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2004, 12:32 PM
Pro Rider
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,265
Default sportsman turning radius

A friend has a 2004.5 sp500. I wanted to see how the turning radius compared to my outlander. I was surprised to see that is was about 18" shorter. We just lined them up on pavement, turned the wheel to lock and slowly did a 180.

Not bad for a large machine. I expected the outlander to be shorter for some reason.

The prairie 650 I had before was about 2 1/2 feet shorter in turning radius than the outlander.

Just food for thought.

Have a nice day.
__________________
2012 Polaris Sportsman 550 Touring
2010 Polaris Scrambler 500
2008 Polaris Sportman 800 EFI (sold)
2007 Yamaha Raptor 700 EFI (sold)
2006 Yamaha Rhino (sold)
2005 Polaris Sportsman 500 (sold)
2004 BRP Outlander (sold)
2002 Kawasaki Prairie 650 (sold) and others...
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-30-2004, 10:41 PM
Pro Rider
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,700
Default sportsman turning radius

Hello jefffoxsr. I am somewhat surprised also. It appears from my literature that the Sportsman has a listed turning radius of 82" and the Outlander has a listed turning radius of 72". Seeing as the front tire follows a larger radius in a turn, maybe the polaris measurement is to the inside of the front tire and the Outlander is to the inside of the rear tire. That might explain the difference in the specs. Could also be that since there is no differential action in the rear tires, that one quad slips its font tires a little more on pavement. Maybe someone else could chime in. I looked long and hard at the outlander before we bought. It seems like a nice quad.
Have a good day jefffoxsr [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
BryceGTX
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2004, 09:49 PM
Pro Rider
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,563
Send a message via AIM to tyler711
Default sportsman turning radius

Could it depend on whether your weight is on the outside or inside of the bike? WIth no differential, one rear tire must slide, and the weight balance would affect whether it was the inside or outside that was sliding, making the front slip tighter or looser? idk, just thinking out loud
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2004, 05:28 AM
mtpockets's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,024
Default sportsman turning radius

i like the tight turning radius on the SP. it really helps me when plowing snow. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
__________________
'70 Honda US90 Blue
'12 Sportsman 550 EPS
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2004, 05:28 AM
Reply Share this with your friends

Tags
500, 850, atv, front, outlander, outlanders, pavement, polaris, radius, slides, sportaman, sportsman, tires, trail, turn, turning



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On