ATV Connection Magazine Forum



       

Today's New Topics


ATV Connection
Decrease font size
Increase font size
Topic Title: Oregon got it right
Topic Summary: New Compromise measure imposes responsibility, retains youth/family activity
Created On: 06/14/2007 12:51 PM
Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Topic Tools Search Topic
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View similar topics View similar topics
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
 06/14/2007 12:51 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
GixerStyle
Weekend Warrior

Posts: 9
Joined: 01/03/2006

Camera Icon   
Oregon's Legislature, which has been a battleground for OHV-related legislation in the current session, has proposed a compromise bill that is receiving wide spread support. Highlights include removal of all age based restrictions for ATV riders, rider fit guidelines (the nations first) for ATV's, and new requirements for safety training classes. Senate Bill 101 would also require those riders under 16 years of age to be accompanied by an adult who is at least 18 years of age, can provide immediate assistance and direction, and has either a valid driver's license or Class I ATV operators permit. The proposed penalty for a violation is a maximum fine of $180.
A previously considered measure, Senate Bill 49, which included a provision to prohibit children under 12 from operating all OHV's on public lands was defeated thanks in large part to the overwhelming opposition from the Oregon OHV community.


Thank you everyone who engaged!
 06/14/2007 09:57 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
blackballed
Pro Rider

Posts: 1126
Joined: 10/29/2002

   
Originally posted by: GixerStyle
"...and new requirements for safety training classes..."


Congratulations...who is footing the bill for these classes and if it's the sticker fund subsidizing the cost with no income restrictions...what percentage (cost) will the new training fund come in at?

-------------------------
Forming a "Long Range Financial Subcommittee" in MI.:
Take two inexplicably expired term motorcycle reps. still serving on the board (one names yet another motorcycle rep)
Add 1 full-size and but 1 atv rep.
Arrogantly claim that the entire process should be finished in 4 conference calls with absolutely no public involvement or any meeting minutes recorded.
Result?
No complaint whatsoever from sheep-like atv clubs with literally tens of millions in play.
Statistics
106031 users are registered to the ATV Connection forum.
There are currently 8 users logged in.
The most users ever online was 2031 on 03/16/2008 at 04:39 PM.
There are currently 529 guests browsing this forum, which makes a total of 537 users using this forum.

FuseTalk Standard Edition - © 1999-2008 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.


Classified Ads |  ATV Forum  |  ATV Connection Magazine  |  Contact Us
 
Forum Archives