Pages: 1
Posted by: maddog56
Twins are smoother, quieter, dont require a counter balancer, are capable of higher rpms, and more.
A single is simpler and requires less maintenance and parts are much cheaper.
Posted by: Shortcut
You guy's haven't ridden a King Quad yet, have you ?
Posted by: Shortcut
I get a kick out of all the talk about vibes. Yes the V-twins are smoother than a single, parallel twins are not as smooth as V's, and the King Quad's are the smoothest single I've ever ridden
Posted by: Shortcut
Quote
Originally posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
realy ? well I wont be buying a KQ twin then
Duh, the King Quad is a single.
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
and twins have alot less vibration
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
Nope I havent, but I have rode my buddies 02 Polaris Sportsmen 700 Twin
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
realy ? well I wont be buying a KQ twin then
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
well the SP 700 was like a caddy compared to the other singles i have ridin
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
o yeah lol woops i was thinking of the twin peaks
Posted by: B200
what are the differences? low end top end towing speed ect.ect what?
Posted by: MOOCOW
Quote
Originally posted by: Shortcut
You guy's haven't ridden a King Quad yet, have you ?
Yes i have rode the King Quad and it vibration is worse then any of the big V's
Posted by: Snowwolfe
My KQ single is way smoother than my 700 twin. Or any other twin I have set on.
Posted by: Gopher500
that and the twins are usually more cold blooded than a single from my exp. (prarie and sp700/600 vs kodiak and sp500)
as for vibe, thats the least of my worries, but the polaris twins are worse than my kodiak, and my scramblers worse than the sportsmans.
as for power, the single should have more lowend but less top, but i could be wrong
