Pages: 1
Posted by: Raptoryfn660r
Out of those picks I would go with the 4x4articcat300.
beartracker is 2 wheel drive and the 4x4timberwolf is way down on power.
Chet
Posted by: Raptoryfn660r
does this artic cat have the dual range trans.?
Posted by: Coyotechaser
I've got to say that the Recon is a good quad but the price seems a little high for a 1998. The Beartracker and the 4x4 Timberwolf are the same vehicle except for the 4x4. They seem to be priced a little high. I would also tend to lean more towards the Cat. I'm not sure if the price of the Cat is good or not. The only thing that bothers me is that the Cat weighs about 585lbs dry and that's alot of weight for 280cc. (Wouldn't it have a triple-range transmission?)
Any more choices? Maybe a Honda 300 4x4?
Posted by: Coyotechaser
Trail, Did you or are you going to look at the Arctic Cat? Just wondering how everything worked out.
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
i am buyin these used i ride on roads ,ice ,snow , mud , and 3 foot creeks iam 5'11 and i weigh around 200 a little less
beartracker 2001 $2500
recon 1998 $2495
timberwolf 1997 $2495
artic cat 1999 $2999
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
ya thats true
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
ive decided to go w/ the artic cat
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
iam not sure i will find out saturday and ill tell ya
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
i cant find any 300 4x4 and if i did i probly will get it i found a 88 for $ 2500 thats crazy and its a dealer
or a 98 warrior 4 $2595 ??
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
iam lookin at a beartracker, artic cat , and a warrior ill tell ya witch one i get. frist i have to sell the mistake i bought, ( it was a trailbalzer) come to find out i would have more use w/ other quads .
Posted by: TrailBlazerguy250
thanx every one but iam gettin a warrior thanx again
