ATV Connection Magazine

2007 Honda 400ex vs. rappy 660 05'

(Click here to view the original thread with full colors/images)




Pages: 1


Posted by: garyc660R

Quote

Originally posted by: Chipper00792
what do u think the top speed of the 2007 400ex would be if it was stock?


Top speed is gonna be mid 60's. I had a mild 416ex and the local boys in blue clocked me at 67mph....that was in a 35mph zone by the way Why would you even consider a 400ex when a Z400 is better in every way and about the same cash?
If you are dead set on a Raptor or 400ex I can give my opinion on both since I have actually OWNED both with plenty of seat time on both. I primarily trail ride on the Hatfield / Mccoy trail system....mainly the fast trails that lend to wide open riding. After you adapt your riding style by leaning more in the corners on the Raptor and ditch the non-sliding stock rear tires they both handle about the same. The Raptor seat-tank junction is much more narrow and lends itself to more body english than the 400ex. The Raptor in stock form has roughly 10 more horses but feels like there is even more of a difference than that IMO. If you pipe them both the difference is even more pronounced. I know you posted that you will leave them completely stock but stock gets boring quick. Ride quality for both is about the same and they jump about the same as well. You will just have to position your body a little different to keep the 400ex level in the air since the weight distribution is favoring the rear of the quad.....where the Raptor is more evenly balanced. The 400ex ran much hotter than the Raptor and the Raptor did'nt start up with a puff of smoke after a year either. Maybe that was because I had to ride it like I stole it to keep up with my riding buddies....who knows?
I watched a bone stock Z400 smoke a piped, cammed, compression increased 400ex like taking candy from a baby. You could eat lunch between this kid shifting gears on the Z400 as well. The 400ex guy knew he had the race in the bag as well...lol. When your buds challenge you to a drag you have to at least run respectable. We are talking guys calling you up in the middle of the night laughing hysterically....for years to come. Good luck on your purchase.

Posted by: garyc660R

Just checked 2007 suggested retail on the manufacturers web sites.....
400ex = 5,999
Z400 = 5,899
WOW!

Posted by: garyc660R

Quote

Originally posted by: SickSixtyRider
The only way you can go 80+ on a 400ex is if you're running about a 12 tooth gear on the rear. But you would burn the s**t out of your clutch TRYING to get there. I think your buddy was just trying to make you feel better by telling you that.


Common misconception with gearing. You can gear a quad to run "X" amount of speed, but if the quad is not making enough power to PULL the additional gearing, the quad could actually be slower.

Posted by: garyc660R

Quote

Originally posted by: ACFreerider
Quote

Originally posted by: EVMANdude are you smoking the 400ex stock top speed is 76mph that is what the manfacture even says it is. And the ds 650 is not better it is a really good dune machine but other then that it takes the rest of that power that it has to pull around its almost 500 pound body. when the 400ex only weighs 378. Also the top speed of the 450er is 83mph out of the box not barely 70mph SRY buddy your wrong.......
Where did you read this? This is soooooo far off. I really can't believe how stupid some people can be when it comes to stuff like this. I've read the EXs top speed from barley hitting 50mph to 75-80...people who don't know what there talking about should really keep there mouth shut instead of making themselves look like jackasses.


Agreed.

Posted by: garyc660R

Quote

Originally posted by: EVMAN
Actually ya i beat the 660 raptor several time no problem also i beat the almost stock banshee just had pipes on it banshee a couple of times in a sand drag banshee definetilly not as fast as the 450's which is what i ride with all the time and i dont know what your talking about not enough power stock has 27 rear horsepower alreaty pleanty of power to do pretty much everything MIne has a cdi rev box 5 horspower gain + 1200rpm dmc comp 4 full exhaust,with end cap off 6-7 horspower.Weight Reductions, fmf power up jets ,uni airfilter, K&N extreme power lid, white brother airbox vents 7 horspower so total of 18 horspower give or take a few added on so 27+18= 45 horsepower give or take a few which the 450r honda is 37 rear horspower stock YFZ 36 rear horspower ad LTR 32 horsepower Banshee stock 37 horspower Stock 660 raptor 35.5 rear horspower. Stock 700 raptor 42 rear horsepower. Even go look them up by yourself if ya dont believe me. SO why dont you go think of some more crap about honda write me back and we will do this all over again. I also see you are brand loyal to yamaha. And that you think honda sucks well why dont ya go look at some videos of the yfz 450 and the honda 450 and tell me the last time yamaha has won against honda in proffesional racing. Never mind ill tell you they have not won any major event since 2004. Hondatook everything until 2006 when ltr came out then that started winning alot of races as well Honda also won baja 1000 i dont think yamaha took 1 race. And the basnshee is a dinasaur has been around to long used to be the best but now 4-strokes have taken over. 450's are the fastest and best race bikes now thats why they dont race the banshee any more ohwel sry ok ttyl byyyyyyyyyy now!

Did you type that with a straight face? The mag pipe test a while back revealed, get this, 1 screaming horsepower. I am sure more was found lower in the RPM range, but when dragging you are using maximum power. It's a waste of money to pipe a 400ex. The pipe was a White Bros by the way. Also, all the rev limiter is doing is beating on your engine because you have already PASSED PEAK HP when the STOCK rev limiter sets in. Yea, you are revving more, but after peak HP, your HP goes down and this of course makes you slower. And you actually posted you have gained 18HP...LMAO. Sorry junior.

Posted by: garyc660R

Quote

Originally posted by: Dwags
X2 45 hp? lol i am just at 55 with my last dyno and i have every thing a 686 raptor can have so u are sayin 45 with just bolt on crap ummm no. period. i would venture to say more like 37-38ish. and a 400ex beatin a raptor? that guy must have his thumb up his butt is you are beatin him....and dont even get me started on u beatin a shee...if a shee is faster than a raptor and theres no way u beat a raptor then i agree there must be magic in ur motor. have a nice day and u wanta see hp for real then ride a hi compresson bike sometime


You just posted he should be around 37-38hp AND he can't beat a Raptor....a stock Raptor only makes high 30's power wise....directly contradicting yourself. Good job.
Stock for stock a Raptor and a Banshee are very very close in a drag on asphalt BTW.....could go either way.

Posted by: garyc660R

Quote

Originally posted by: SickSixtyRider
Quote

Originally posted by: EVMANActually ya i beat the 660 raptor several time no problem also i beat the almost stock banshee just had pipes on it banshee a couple of times in a sand drag banshee definetilly not as fast as the 450's which is what i ride with all the time and i dont know what your talking about not enough power stock has 27 rear horsepower alreaty pleanty of power to do pretty much everything MIne has a cdi rev box 5 horspower gain + 1200rpm dmc comp 4 full exhaust,with end cap off 6-7 horspower.Weight Reductions, fmf power up jets ,uni airfilter, K&N extreme power lid, white brother airbox vents 7 horspower so total of 18 horspower give or take a few added on so 27+18= 45 horsepower give or take a few which the 450r honda is 37 rear horspower stock YFZ 36 rear horspower ad LTR 32 horsepower Banshee stock 37 horspower Stock 660 raptor 35.5 rear horspower. Stock 700 raptor 42 rear horsepower. Even go look them up by yourself if ya dont believe me. SO why dont you go think of some more crap about honda write me back and we will do this all over again. I also see you are brand loyal to yamaha. And that you think honda sucks well why dont ya go look at some videos of the yfz 450 and the honda 450 and tell me the last time yamaha has won against honda in proffesional racing. Never mind ill tell you they have not won any major event since 2004. Hondatook everything until 2006 when ltr came out then that started winning alot of races as well Honda also won baja 1000 i dont think yamaha took 1 race. And the basnshee is a dinasaur has been around to long used to be the best but now 4-strokes have taken over. 450's are the fastest and best race bikes now thats why they dont race the banshee any more ohwel sry ok ttyl byyyyyyyyyy now!
400ex beating Raptors and Banshees?!......holy balls..I almost peed myself laughing. EX's are good trail quads but for cryin' out loud, lets be for real here.

Your just mad because you can't gain 18hp from bolt ons.


Posted by: garyc660R

Quote

Originally posted by: redhornet
Being fairly new to the sport, and the proud owner of a 07 400ex, I am curious as to why there is so much emphasis on racing and head-to-head speed on these boards. If you want to race back and forth up sand dunes or down a flat drag strip, go buy the fastest quad you can find and you can fluff your tail feathers in everybodies face. Who fricken cares how fast you can go in a straight line?Buy the quad you need for the type of riding you'll do. If you ride trails like me, get a 400ex or a Z400, if you want to race, buy the race ready quads. If you just want to show off, buy the biggest quad you can find, mod the heck out of it and watch your dollars float away with your dragstrip wins.Comparing head to head speed in quads that are designed for different tasks is like comparing an F-150 to a BMW M3.Lets get real people.


And when everyone stopped to BS, what was all of the talk about? Not about how the 'ol hornet was looking good in the woods....nnnoooo. All of the talk was how you had your a$$ handed to you when the drag went down. You know who that is making phone calls in the middle of the night, laughing hysterically, don't 'ya?

Posted by: Raptoryfn660r

Quote

Originally posted by: EVMAN
HEY RAPTOR 13 , 10 to 13 wow you are probely an immiture 40 year old virgin who smokes in his room all day. Why dont you learn what you are TALKING ABOUT BEFORE YOU TYPE IN ALL OF THIS SHI* IN ALRIGHT SEE LATER BITC*



I don't know what's going on here and I have not read the whole thread but you had better chill real quick if you expect to post here on the ATV Connection forums.



Posted by: reconranger

I have never been able to warm up to the Raptor 660. It is to narrow and tippy for my taste, and it carries its weight high in the frame.

The 400EX is a nice machine, but underpowered by todays standards. Handling is excellent and ballanced. It (along with the 300EX) is probably the best trail quad of all time! The engine doesn't mind being lugged down, and ridden slow, so it is my choice for tight trails.

Posted by: reconranger

I find the Raptor suspension to be "mushy". I could ride one, but I would have to spend thousands of dollars on a wider axle and a whole new wider front suspension.

Have you looked at the Z400?????????

Posted by: Martianman

Why consider either when you can get a Predator for about the same money?No I don't own a predator,but a buddy I ride with has a 2005 model with HMF slip-on ,uni filter and jetted and believe me it runs very well.Just a thought,might be worth comparing prices between 400 EX,Z400,Raptor 660,and Predator which has reverse also from 2005 on.Good luck

Posted by: Scooter86

Quote

Originally posted by: SickSixtyRider
Unbelieveable. How does Honda even compete?!


Reputation and that alone. There really is no excuse to charge that much for a design with no major revisions in the past 8 years. Suzuki has made as many if not more revisions to the Z, and not just foofoo stuff like changing the plastic design. They have given us a much better front suspension and a more powerful motor. Anyway, I would probably go with the Raptor. You can throw some offset wheels and better tires on the thing and it will be fine. They aren't as stable as the EX, big whoop. Just use a bit more body english to get around the corners. I rode with a completely stock 400EX last spring. While he was topped out in 5th, I could pass him at under 3/4 throttle in 4th on the YFZ. Even the big bore utes were walking away from him on the roadways we were riding from time to time. That aint happening with a Raptor!

Posted by: Scooter86

I agree 100%

Posted by: Scooter86

Yes, it is. In '03 they had weak axles-fixed for '04. They had a run of bad clutch covers, but if you are buying new it won't be a problem. If you buy used it is a recall item and can be taken care of at no cost to you(if it hasn't already.) Other than that there have been few problems with the atv. The engine is a detuned version of the 400cc bike engine and is solid. Suzuki stepped it up for '05 or '06 and hotted up the engine some, gave the front shocks rezzies and more adjustment, and did a few other small changes. About the only place the 400EX has an advantage over the Z is slow riding. If you can get within a few hundred bucks price, then the Z is the way to go. Even more so if you won't be upgrading from stock any time soon. There are a billion threads of Z vs Ex around here Again, the Rappy is going to be faster straight line but will take more work on the tighter trails. They all weigh roughly the same. Between those 3, I think the Z is the best all around quad, although any one will have you grinning ear to ear on most any trail ride.

Posted by: Scooter86

Quote

Originally posted by: Yoshiequipped
how you just gonna tell me what my 400 will do? were you there? ok then, point proven. but no BS! my friends where following me down a major road at clocked me at 80 on cruise control following me. so argue that. (sicksixtyrider)


I know my 450 won't do 80 or 85 and it has been piped. How is your heavier, lower tech 400 going to go faster? I haven't come across a 400EX yet that is even close to the power of my quad that didn't have some major motor work done, so what has been done to yours? What gearing are you running?

Posted by: Scooter86

LOL at EVMAN! I went on a big ride last year with a few Z400's, a few Raptor 660's, an LTR, a bunch of big bore utes, a Trailblazer, and a cherry(but stock) 400EX. This was at a rare place in NY where quads are allowed on certain roads, and there was quite a bit of road riding involved. I was behind the 400EX on one stretch in 4th gear about 1/2 throttle, and was wondering why the group kept getting further and further away from us. The kid on the EX told me he was tapped out WOT in 5th and that was all she had. Now maybe he just had a wimpy 400, but that thing could only muster about 55mph top speed, on fairly level pavement. It hung just fine in the woods, but I didn't see him win one drag when we got to the sand pit. If I were you dude, I would hang on to yours because it must have magic hp fairies living in the valve train or something. Oh, and you absolutely HAVE to show me a dyno chart for your 45rwhp 400ex. Come on dude, the Z quads need a 440 kit to be competitive with the 450's. You are trying to tell me the lesser powered, lower tech Honda motor can make better power with just bolt ons?

Posted by: 4wheelerfred

Quote

Originally posted by: Chipper00792
Well the more and more i read about the brand new z400 the more i like itmfrom waht ive read it is better than the 400ex with a little bit more power and its liquid cooled which is a plsu since the 400ex is air cooled(which i hear isnt the greatest) so is the z400 as good as it sounds?



Yes it is, the Z400 is one realy realy awsome quad. you cant go wrong with it.

it also helps that the aftermarket parts list is never ending for them


Posted by: 4wheelerfred

Quote

Originally posted by: SickSixtyRider
I like the yellow with the blue seat. It's the old school look. Black plastic is hard to keep clean and lookin' new.


bingo,

that whit pred looks realy hot, it would be realy hard for me to choose between it and the Z...


i gues there is no replacment fro displacment LOL

Posted by: DuneRider650

The Raptor i have never liked (the 660) simply because of its chasis. The raptor has the power there while the ex is underpowerd but has better handling...between these two you are going to choose between power without so good of handling or handling without so much power. A balance point in between these two would be the Z400.

Posted by: ZillaRider87

Quote

Originally posted by: EVMAN
Actually ya i beat the 660 raptor several time no problem also i beat the almost stock banshee just had pipes on it banshee a couple of times in a sand drag banshee definetilly not as fast as the 450's which is what i ride with all the time and i dont know what your talking about not enough power stock has 27 rear horsepower alreaty pleanty of power to do pretty much everything MIne has a cdi rev box 5 horspower gain + 1200rpm dmc comp 4 full exhaust,with end cap off 6-7 horspower.Weight Reductions, fmf power up jets ,uni airfilter, K&N extreme power lid, white brother airbox vents 7 horspower so total of 18 horspower give or take a few added on so 27+18= 45 horsepower give or take a few which the 450r honda is 37 rear horspower stock YFZ 36 rear horspower ad LTR 32 horsepower Banshee stock 37 horspower Stock 660 raptor 35.5 rear horspower. Stock 700 raptor 42 rear horsepower. Even go look them up by yourself if ya dont believe me. SO why dont you go think of some more crap about honda write me back and we will do this all over again. I also see you are brand loyal to yamaha. And that you think honda sucks well why dont ya go look at some videos of the yfz 450 and the honda 450 and tell me the last time yamaha has won against honda in proffesional racing. Never mind ill tell you they have not won any major event since 2004. Hondatook everything until 2006 when ltr came out then that started winning alot of races as well Honda also won baja 1000 i dont think yamaha took 1 race. And the basnshee is a dinasaur has been around to long used to be the best but now 4-strokes have taken over. 450's are the fastest and best race bikes now thats why they dont race the banshee any more ohwel sry ok ttyl byyyyyyyyyy now!


man you crack me up! you say a new filter, new lid and some holes in your airbox give you 7 horsepower? AHAHA now ive heard everything. must be one bada$$ airfilter! and horsepower doesnt mean sh!t, it matters how you lay it to the ground.
"also i beat the almost stock banshee just had pipes on it banshee a couple of times in a sand drag"
JUST had pipeshuh? do you know what pipes will do to a banshee? they unleash the beast!
"And the banshee is a dinasaur has been around to long used to be the best but now 4-strokes have taken over"
when the shee first came out it dominated the baja 1000 actually. and who cares how long its been out? ill put my 20 year old quad against your '45' HP 400ex anyday. take a guess on who would come out? trails or drag, dont matter to me.

Posted by: Steveo10

The rappy has some much more power... the suspension is great and if you decide to mod out the rappy it responds to mods great!

Posted by: Dwags

X2 45 hp? lol i am just at 55 with my last dyno and i have every thing a 686 raptor can have so u are sayin 45 with just bolt on crap ummm no. period. i would venture to say more like 37-38ish. and a 400ex beatin a raptor? that guy must have his thumb up his butt is you are beatin him....and dont even get me started on u beatin a shee...if a shee is faster than a raptor and theres no way u beat a raptor then i agree there must be magic in ur motor. have a nice day and u wanta see hp for real then ride a hi compresson bike sometime

Posted by: ACFreerider

Quote

Originally posted by: EVMAN
dude are you smoking the 400ex stock top speed is 76mph that is what the manfacture even says it is. And the ds 650 is not better it is a really good dune machine but other then that it takes the rest of that power that it has to pull around its almost 500 pound body. when the 400ex only weighs 378. Also the top speed of the 450er is 83mph out of the box not barely 70mph SRY buddy your wrong.......


Where did you read this? This is soooooo far off. I really can't believe how stupid some people can be when it comes to stuff like this. I've read the EXs top speed from barley hitting 50mph to 75-80...people who don't know what there talking about should really keep there mouth shut instead of making themselves look like jackasses.

Posted by: ACFreerider

Quote

Originally posted by: EVMAN
I do not know where you read that the 400ex barely hits 50mph the honda 250 top speed is beetween 50-55 mph how is a 400ex slower then that even my little cousins 150cc hammerhead go-cart does 42 mph stock and they just put on tones of aftermarket parts it i probally doin close to 50 mph right now and it only has a 3 gear fully auto engine so i think you should do a little more research like i have done and everyone i have talk to even the proffesionals at dealers said that it was around 76mph dont believe me look it up on the internet.


I wasn't saying it barely hit 50 I was talking about peoples range on top speed. And if you think what dealers say is true then I guess it really does only barley hit 50 because thats they told me. I have one and know it wouldnt ever hit over 70 65-68 is about where its at.

Posted by: ACFreerider

Dude your like straight up retarded. I have a 400ex, my dad has a piped z400 the z eats my ex all day even with him weighing more then me...and a stock one wouldn't stand a chance in hell against a raptor or shee.

Posted by: ajd187

Quote

Originally posted by: SickSixtyRider
Unbelieveable. How does Honda even compete?!


Well if I were buying a 400 I would get a Honda. The Z has had too many reliablity issues (breaking frames in 03, corroding clutch covers in 05, who knows what else in coming years) to trust.

Posted by: atvrocks

I am so frustrated when people are bashing the 400ex for nothing . yeah yeah its underpowered ...but i was out accelerating on dirt: z 400 , banshees, raptor t'ill 40 mph when my ex was stock. .yeah other quad have a far better handling ... but in trailriding try to beat a 400ex, the only reason that you MAY beat a ex in the trail is if your quad is alot more powerful than the ex so its not because of the handling ....yeah yeah its aircooled what an old technology and it surely bad .... 400ex dont overheat and dont need liquid cooling.. yeah yeah its an old engine tech ... why change something that works great ?
i had so much fun with my ex since i have it , i never had engine problem , its one of the wheelie king in stability it can go forever on the 2 rear wheel and even the side wheels,,it jumps pretty well, if you hillclimb its very strong on second gear , if you dragrace on dirt it has lot of traction and you can beat a lot of quads till you hit fourth speed , and with many mods it become a very powerful atv with lot of torque. with mine i beat modded raptors, z 400, ds 650, 450 r.
400ex is a cool quad even if its not powerful like bigger cc quad stock. its definitly not a kid quad and why wife's ride this is because its easy to ride stable and handles so great.





**scuse me for the english ,its not my best language

Posted by: atvrocks

Quote

Originally posted by: raptor13
This is a funny forum---------I dont get the love for the honda 400 ex, this quad is rear heavy, powerless, and from my accounts not very dependable. This is not a quad to compare to the 660. It is however a good one to buy your wife to retreave refreshments for the guys. Dont buy the RHonda ex, its for girls or guys who like abuse. You will be sucking hind tit from everyone on the trail except for the poor guy that fell in love with the 300ex and dumped all of his piggybank money into building the S&&T out of a dust eating man b%^ch. As you can tell I think hondas are great for kids but as soon as the hair pops out you need to ride something else preferably a YAMI. Yamaha has slapped the competition around for years and from the recent rides doestn look like its changing. Raptors are the ONLY 4 stroke quads to consider in my veiw. All of the tip happy, too torquey reveiws on here are a joke, Ive had a 2001 for years and never experieinced these occurances, although I will say the banshees still rule if you ride in the desert or large open areas.


is raptor13 for thirteen years old ? a bicycle is powerless , a 400ex isnt , id like to show you

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

I totally agree with garyc660R saying that they r basically the same price. Why does the 400EX cast so much anyway. Isn't the cost supposed to come down on something with an outdated motor. The Z is such a superior machine, price and ride both.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

Unbelieveable. How does Honda even compete?!

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

I think your radar gun was clocking in kilometers per hour. lol Raptors don't even go 80.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

I'm not saying that the 400ex is a piece of s--t, it's one of the most reliable machines ever built. I'm just saying that it costs too much for what it has.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

I like the yellow with the blue seat. It's the old school look. Black plastic is hard to keep clean and lookin' new.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

The only way you can go 80+ on a 400ex is if you're running about a 12 tooth gear on the rear. But you would burn the s**t out of your clutch TRYING to get there. I think your buddy was just trying to make you feel better by telling you that.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

You're right. I was just saying that even if he had enough power, his gearing would have to go WAY up.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

The new 400ex has reverse now. And most people say that the 400 handles better also. But if you widen the Rappy out, it's just as good. Still, go with the Raptor.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

The only 400+ cc quad that a modded ex can beat is another stock ex.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

I totally agree with you (redhornet) 100%. Everything you said is so true. I'm not knocking anyones choices. I'm just annoyed when people claim that they beat machines that everyone knows are faster. Sure, in a tight woods or track a 400ex will hang with or maybe even beat alot of other quads, but drag racing....um, no. The reason that atvrocks said he was beating raptors, ds's, 450r's and z's on dirt drags is because they have more power to break the tires loose, thus loosing traction and acceleration. Put them on black top or hard pack and the 400 doesn't stand a chance.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

Quote

Originally posted by: EVMAN
Actually ya i beat the 660 raptor several time no problem also i beat the almost stock banshee just had pipes on it banshee a couple of times in a sand drag banshee definetilly not as fast as the 450's which is what i ride with all the time and i dont know what your talking about not enough power stock has 27 rear horsepower alreaty pleanty of power to do pretty much everything MIne has a cdi rev box 5 horspower gain + 1200rpm dmc comp 4 full exhaust,with end cap off 6-7 horspower.Weight Reductions, fmf power up jets ,uni airfilter, K&N extreme power lid, white brother airbox vents 7 horspower so total of 18 horspower give or take a few added on so 27+18= 45 horsepower give or take a few which the 450r honda is 37 rear horspower stock YFZ 36 rear horspower ad LTR 32 horsepower Banshee stock 37 horspower Stock 660 raptor 35.5 rear horspower. Stock 700 raptor 42 rear horsepower. Even go look them up by yourself if ya dont believe me. SO why dont you go think of some more crap about honda write me back and we will do this all over again. I also see you are brand loyal to yamaha. And that you think honda sucks well why dont ya go look at some videos of the yfz 450 and the honda 450 and tell me the last time yamaha has won against honda in proffesional racing. Never mind ill tell you they have not won any major event since 2004. Hondatook everything until 2006 when ltr came out then that started winning alot of races as well Honda also won baja 1000 i dont think yamaha took 1 race. And the basnshee is a dinasaur has been around to long used to be the best but now 4-strokes have taken over. 450's are the fastest and best race bikes now thats why they dont race the banshee any more ohwel sry ok ttyl byyyyyyyyyy now!



400ex beating Raptors and Banshees?!......holy balls..I almost peed myself laughing. EX's are good trail quads but for cryin' out loud, lets be for real here.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

Quote

Originally posted by: garyc660R
Quote


Your just mad because you can't gain 18hp from bolt ons.hr>


Well, sh!t, I might as well trade my Rappy in for a 400 EX if I want beat everyones a$$ in a drag. All I gotta do is get a fancier seat and some chrome lug nuts and I'll get an extra 4 HP. WOO HOO!BR>
And Redhornet... nobody cares about straight line speed except EVMAN. We're just telling him what's real and what's fantasy.

Posted by: SickSixtyRider

Come on EVMAN, lets hear another one about how you beat a Raptor modded with a R1 motor with a 250 Timberwolf in a hillclimb. Its Monday and I want to start the week off with a good laugh.

Posted by: 4wheel4food

I gotta stand up for my bike...I have a '03 Z400 and I love it...Do i care about drag racing,
NO...But 60-65 will get me there fast enough...It eats trails(dirt,sand, rocks, whatever) alive...
I love this bike because I ride with people who have all diff. kinds of bikes from 660 Grizzlies
to 660 Raptors, etc. and it never fails to get me anywhere they are all going...If you wanna
ride balls to the wall, it can do that..It you wanna tackle technical trail rides, it will do that...
I have ridden most of my buddies bikes(raptor 660, kodiak 400, predator, sportsman,etc.) and
I haven't found one yet that even comes close to my Z...That's just my opinion....My best advice
to people who are looking to buy, is to try and ride one before buying one....If that is not an option
it's really a crap shoot as to which one you will like the best...Good luck and let us know what
you end up with....

Posted by: Evasiveone

I agree with looking at the Z400.

But since you stated you do not like the looks of the Z400 you need to look at the '07 Predator 500. For 2007 they lowered the price of the Predator 500 to $5999. There is no comparison performance wise between the ol' 400ex and the 500 Predator. Those Preddies are fast as hell and look damn good.

Go sit on all the different bikes and see which one strikes your fancy. But for the price I would look real hard at the Z400 and Predator 500, especially the Preddy.

Posted by: Evasiveone

Quote

Originally posted by: EVMAN
dude are you smoking the 400ex stock top speed is 76mph that is what the manfacture even says it is. And the ds 650 is not better it is a really good dune machine but other then that it takes the rest of that power that it has to pull around its almost 500 pound body. when the 400ex only weighs 378. Also the top speed of the 450er is 83mph out of the box not barely 70mph SRY buddy your wrong.......



You are not getting out of this that easy.

You keep saying that you are right and we are a bunch of hemp smoking idiots and we need to look up the facts. I think maybe you should show us these facts. Because we could look for a year and not find facts to back up your statements.

No 400ex is going to hit 76 mph stock. Like everyone has already told you 65-68 stock. And no 450 is going to go 83 mph out of the box. In fact no bike sold today is going to go much over 75 mph stock for liability reasons. Even the 683 cc EFI 700R has a speed limiter that retards the timing to limit it to 74 mph.

You need to pull your head out of the magazines (and other places) and listen to people that know what these quads can do personally and not just read about it.


Posted by: themartinz

I have two 05 Honda 400EXs that I bought about 3 months ago. They were brand new so I got them for $4999. I bought them for friends to ride. If you want a lot more bang for your buck...go with the Predator 500. Cheaper than the Honda, but night and day more powerful. Z400 is probably in between the Predator and the Honda performance wise. Hondas are definitley reliable. Go to Pismo and try to rent a 400...you will only see Hondas!

Posted by: Fulltiltrider

Originally posted by: EVMAN

A raptor with a r1 engine dood that would be horrible at the climb of hill climbing that i do it would just spin back tires and grab and flip it and roll down the hill


Ill have you know that a r1 powered zilla was the fastest thing up the beaverdale hillclimb last weekend. not just the fastest quad, the fastest thing. it even beat a bike with a kz 900 2 stroke motor


by the way i bet my deathtrap will do 80 in 3rd

Posted by: nathanpri08

Whoever said there 400ex whent 70-75mph is off there medication!My 400ex had respectible mods and at best it would go 68mph.My ds goes 70-75mph on a lucky day pushing her a little.yoshiequipped your exagerating just a little or ALOT.Dont mean to call you a liar but that 400ex just isnt that fast.Sh*t if they where that fast i would have kept mine and not sold it for my ds650x.

Posted by: nathanpri08

Put my buick skylark against any stock honda civic.lol.Atleat i can say its not a 4cylinder.

Posted by: duneracer500

Quote

Originally posted by: Chipper00792
I am trying to decide bewtween the brand new 400ex( Which im really considering of getting) and a raptor 660 2005, both would be completely stock and i would probally never put any mods on it which one would you choose and would be the overall better quad, and i mean not just how fast they are, there handling and overall performance to. I would mostly just be riding thru woods and open fields.


Thanks


If I were you I would go with the Raptor 660. Nevermind the fact that its 260 cc's higher and has reverse. Its also a Yamaha. Honda may be the best on earth, but when it comes to sport quads theres nothing better than a good old Yamaha. As far as top speed goes, you might get 5 mph higher with the Raptor. Raptor tops anywhere from 70 - 75. The Honda look for anything between 65 - 70. The raptor handles a-lot better, its better on trails, it has a more confortable seat, and also has reverse.

Hope this helps.

Posted by: duneracer500

Thats nothing guys. Listen to this funny load of bull.

In that ATV Source Forum, I had a guy tell me his KFX 700 could run 85 stock. Then, he told me his buddy had a banshee that would do over 100. I was wanting to talk to guys knowledgeable of atv's, that right there made me change my forum. Even though, after I corrected the little weasel everyone went killer on me and they all ganged up on me telling me I didn't know what I was talking about.

Thankfully, I found this forum where people who know their abc's to atv forums.

Posted by: crazy1291

TO CHIPPER00792 (TOPIC STARTER) if you can afford a 2007 400ex, which costs 5999$USD msrp, why dont you buy a brand new z400 or a brand new pred? they all cost the same, and polaris has greatly improved the reliability of the pred in the last few years.


TO EVMAN (THE GUY WITH A 45HP 400EX) I have just one question............... when you raced the banshee and the raptor.......... WERE....... THE QUADS........ RUNNING?????? LMAO, YOU REALLY THOUGHT YOU COULD BEAT A BANSHEE AND A RAPTOR WITH YOUR 45HP 400EX.
WELL MAYBE THE RAPTOR TIPPED OVER AND THE BANSHEE WAS GETTING A REBUILD (NO OFFENSE SHEE AND RAPPY RIDERS, im just having some fun)

or maybe....... HE PULLED ON SPARK PLUG ON THE BANSHEE, (WHICH BASICALLY TURNS IT INTO AN OVERWEIGHT BLASTER) AND HE SOAKED THE RAPTOR'S AIR FILTER IN WATER, AND PUT SAND IN HIS ENGINE OIL? OR MAYBE HE EVEN SWITCHED THE GAS, PREMIX IN THE RAPPY- REGULAR IN THE BANSHEE. THAT SHOULD FFFF THEM UP PRETTY GOOD. lmao, thanks for giving us something to laugh about--- here's a link to submit your story at........ comedy central aka jokes.com

Posted by: crazy1291

just calm down............... this is not a battle ground

Posted by: crazy1291

Quote

Originally posted by: squirterboy
Quote

Originally posted by: duneracer500
Thats nothing guys. Listen to this funny load of bull.

In that ATV Source Forum, I had a guy tell me his KFX 700 could run 85 stock. Then, he told me his buddy had a banshee that would do over 100. I was wanting to talk to guys knowledgeable of atv's, that right there made me change my forum. Even though, after I corrected the little weasel everyone went killer on me and they all ganged up on me telling me I didn't know what I was talking about.

Thankfully, I found this forum where people who know their abc's to atv forums.


my uncle gets around 106 mph on his banshee so it dusnt surprise me


that banshee isnt stock though- and i doubt a stock kfx700 does 85 mph- its more like high 70s or 80 mph- my friends dad's been pulled over for going 130kmh (80mph approximately) in a 80kmh zone

Posted by: Yoshiequipped

Quote

Originally posted by: Chipper00792
what do u think the top speed of the 2007 400ex would be if it was stock?


the top speed on my 05 400ex was about 73-75 mph. thats layed over the gas tank complaetly wound out, i dont weight but 140 pounds so that gives it a little more speed right there. now with my pipe and fully broke in motor i have been clocked at 80 on my new one and 85 goin down hill on my first 05 which blew flames out both sides about 10 feet long while trail riding. (honda dealership didnt put the oil line on the top of the motor on all the way and it blew it back off and ignited the oil) scariest experience in my life!

Posted by: Yoshiequipped

Quote

Originally posted by: SickSixtyRider
Unbelieveable. How does Honda even compete?!


big name and reliability, basic design makes for esay repairs and ease of maintainance. sometimes the most simple designs are the best!

Posted by: Yoshiequipped

how you just gonna tell me what my 400 will do? were you there? ok then, point proven. but no BS! my friends where following me down a major road at clocked me at 80 on cruise control following me. so argue that. (sicksixtyrider)

Posted by: BBR650

i do agree that comparing the two is like comparing a metro to a mustang, but a 400 ex has its place a good trail bike especially now that it has reverse. the downfall it has is that it is air cooled. i have had an 03 and 04 raptors and liked the rides of them both. i agree about swapping the stock rear tires out. when you want them to slide they wont and when you want them to hook they wont. your preference will make your decicion, what kind of riding you do and what you ride with. a little word of warning, if you buy a 400 anything dont get mad at the utility's that are gonna pick on you.....my lil 650 outty likes stock and piped 400's for snacks. so if it were me 660 it, if i was going to do it again,(which im thinkin seriously) i would have another 04 660.

Posted by: Chipper00792

I am trying to decide bewtween the brand new 400ex( Which im really considering of getting) and a raptor 660 2005, both would be completely stock and i would probally never put any mods on it which one would you choose and would be the overall better quad, and i mean not just how fast they are, there handling and overall performance to. I would mostly just be riding thru woods and open fields.


Thanks

Posted by: Chipper00792

Yeah i feel the same way, does anyone have the new 2007 400ex?

Posted by: Chipper00792

what do u think the top speed of the 2007 400ex would be if it was stock?

Posted by: Chipper00792

Well i think personally you are both on crack, but whatever u say...... I think the z400 isnt the most appealing atv like the colors yellow with blue seat, if im gonna spend that much money i want it to look sharp like the new 400ex's do

Posted by: Chipper00792

Well the more and more i read about the brand new z400 the more i like itmfrom waht ive read it is better than the 400ex with a little bit more power and its liquid cooled which is a plsu since the 400ex is air cooled(which i hear isnt the greatest) so is the z400 as good as it sounds?

Posted by: Chipper00792

Well when isaid they didnt look good i wa particualary talking about the yellow and blue seated one but now i see the black one and it looks really cool

Posted by: 1128633636

Now Now Raptor13, to your shagrin not everyone has only ridden one or two bikes in this forum.... There's some good banter back and fourth.... But whoever said anything stock does 83mph is smok-n bad stuff and needs a little reality adjustment.... I believe "Redhornet" from Murrieta Ca. said it best "if I can keep up with my friends" it's all good. Seriously I ride all sand dunes here in So Cal (Glamis/Dumont). There is only so fast you can go before the front end comes up and steering is an after-thought. I do admit, don't have a clue on the riding style in Wis, Ok or N Car. I'm guesing woods and trails ? Could be wrong... But truley, nothing sucks power out of a machine like sand (so that's my measuring stick). And from where I come from it's alway's a HP to weight ratio that wins (up the big competition hills) regardless of MFG. If you have the money to go lighter, while thowing in CCs fuel and air, you'll win... That's just the simple nature of physics....Trust me, I got my doors blown off at the beginning..(04 KFX700)...

NOW 796cc w/ 11.5 comp, Crower 254 degree cams, mild port, Empi (FST) duel 44mm down draft carb, Dalton full clutch, HMF Duel Exhaust, FST CDI box, Works shocks, Skat trak Extremems and a little VP110 gas...the rest is bling......................Build your bike; have fun ! And ride safe........That's the most important goal

Posted by: raptor13

This is a funny forum---------I dont get the love for the honda 400 ex, this quad is rear heavy, powerless, and from my accounts not very dependable. This is not a quad to compare to the 660. It is however a good one to buy your wife to retreave refreshments for the guys. Dont buy the RHonda ex, its for girls or guys who like abuse. You will be sucking hind tit from everyone on the trail except for the poor guy that fell in love with the 300ex and dumped all of his piggybank money into building the S&&T out of a dust eating man b%^ch. As you can tell I think hondas are great for kids but as soon as the hair pops out you need to ride something else preferably a YAMI. Yamaha has slapped the competition around for years and from the recent rides doestn look like its changing. Raptors are the ONLY 4 stroke quads to consider in my veiw. All of the tip happy, too torquey reveiws on here are a joke, Ive had a 2001 for years and never experieinced these occurances, although I will say the banshees still rule if you ride in the desert or large open areas.

Posted by: raptor13

13 is my old number from racing, I have 3 quads presently and Ill let you choose which one you would like to take a beat down from, here goes- 06 raptor 700 r slight mods, 02 banshee major mods(78 rwhp but will still only run around 92 because of gearing), or the suzuki quadmaster 50.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I new you were a pansie, picking the quadmaster. I telll you what Ill take a bicycle as you suggested and you bring the rhonda 400, At least on the bike Ill still have my dignity. I just love this forum, some with knowledge some without you being the latter of the two. As I said the Rhonda 400 is a good quad if your a pippled up teen with raging horemones or for anyone who sports panties albeit girls or freaks. Go home, service yourself, get rid of some of that poisen and come back on here when you can think clearly.

Posted by: raptor13

EVMAN, cool off man your losing your mind. Raced a raptor and banshee and beat them on a 400ex???????? Are you SH&TING ME!!!! The last time I checked this was an atv forum, not EVMAN in wonderland. Hey IM the biggest critic of honda ATVs and think that they fell off the wagon after the 250r and the 3bie 350x. Hell a 400 ex cant even beat those. Maybe on planet zolar things are completely reversed. All of you guys on here spouting this dung are very entertaining. Ill give the 400 ex credit for being a good trail quad because it doesnt have enough power to get you in trouble. Regardless of that its all about what you like I guess but keep the bull to a minimum. And be carefull about what you claim to be factual, REALITY BITES and it rides a YAMI>

Posted by: raptor13

Evman, again with these antics. What are we to do with you. These raptors and 450s your refering to must have 600 lb riders if your stoppong and waiting on them. If you want and like the 400ex than be our guest but these hp claims sound like something out of a import car mag. Maybe you just have a complex about your quad and feel that you have to build it up. I will give you some advice, the bolt ons that youve done dont add up individually, for instance lets say these are advertised gains from manufactors 7hp pipe, 5 hp filter kit, 3 hp jettting. added together you have an additional 15 hp, but this is not the case. Some boltons negate total effect just as they do in building a car engine. thes mods together would probably net you aroud 9hp. Soooo the bolt ons you have vs the Hp you claim are short of a miracle. I guess my raptor has a net of 32 more hp because i have a pipe, air kit, hot cam, and a power programmer. Just added all the best case numbers from the manufactor. sound about right. Wrong, I can tell you its never been dynoed and certainly doesnt have that kind of HP. Another thing to consider is peak hp numbers can be very deceiving. If you make minimal hp uup to 4500 rpm and then make the magic number fro about 1500 rpm a well tuned, and planned quad identical to yours that makes more usable hp and torque longer than you will crush you and probably have a little less peak HP> Keep riding the Rhonda if you like. For us men will take something with more of the wow factor.

Posted by: raptor13

Evman, forgot to comment on your rant about honda being the winningest quad. That is a stupid comparison. Thats like saying an acura won most of the scca races and you bought one and said its faster and better than a Viper. Another point, I raced semi pro in california for 6-7 years back around 90-98. I raced banshees when we were ALOWED to race the 250r. We constantly mopped the floor with them, 2 years later the honda guys cried so much they made us sleeve the banshees down so that they could keep up. Basing your quad purchase on mx racing is fine but keep your comparisons in the same class. 400 ex vs. yfz450----NO 400ex vs. Raptor 660 or 700----------NO 400ex vs 350 raptor or warrior----------maybe. Hondas answer was the 450r, and thats not impressive.

Posted by: raptor13

I think we may have scared evie off. If my calculations are correct, evman may be 10 to 13 years of age- from a planet not of this solar system- and high on kool-aid and cheetos. Got to love post from these guys, the are radically funny. It seems on these forums that whatever you own is the best regarless of fact, and that skill will over come all. This is a crazy world we live in where raptors, banshees, zillas, 450s are all whipping boys for the 400ex- you know its funny just to type this. Evman I have a bone stock 05 raptor, I would race you for the title to your spacecraft. This is an age old argument- its always (i beat a raptor) or (I beat a banshee). At least we can see who set the mark. YAMAHA I would like to stir another pot- Evman and all of you other Rhonda fans- I could bet that your all big import car fans too. It seems that this is the same BS that you here any friday night on the streets about honda cars. Trash ball civics with junkyard swaps and ebay turbo systems pushing monster HP numbers( that would be about 200 hp for all of us here on earth but on planet zolar its huge)

Posted by: Toolboy

My brothers 400 ex is stock and it goes 65-70 max. I don't see how you are getting much more speed without incredible mods. I'm not calling anyone a liar, I would just have to see it to believe it. Other 400's we ride with have similar performance as my brothers.

On a side note saw a stock trx honda 450 go all out against a bomb Outy 800 with 28" Dirt Devils on it. The bomb took off and let by 2 quads and held it all the way to top end which was the same for both. They went at it for about 3/4 of a mile.

Posted by: redhornet

As a brand new ATV rider, (rode MX 20 years ago) I chose the 400ex for its proven reliability and all-around trail bike effectiveness. I bought my early teen boys the 250ex so there was no need to go any bigger for me since I'd have to stay with them anyway.

I clearly have a solid trail bike with ample power, good reliability and a balanced ride. When the time comes, I will certainly look for more power and either mod the ex or buy something better out of the box like the Z400 or a Raptor.

To each his own. You need to know what you plan on doing with the bike before you buy. If you just want to impress your friends on the drag strip, buy the Raptor. If you want to go on 40 mile desert rides and not worry about anything, buy the Honda. I don't need to race any body or impress anybody, I just want to ride and have fun without the hassle.

Posted by: redhornet

I don't get the fascination with top speed and drag racing. Is this grammar school?

It's about fun and what's right for you. I ride trails and don't need to hit 60 mph. I need handling, reliability. I don't hang out with the beer croud racing up and down a sand hill all day. I expect to be able to ride till my tank's half empty and ride back, and have some fun on the way without worrying about blowing up.

To each his own. Honda makes a fine machine and obviously a top seller or they wouldn't have kept it the same all these years. Only lately are some of these other bikes catching up. Honda will likely update the old horse soon and blow them all away again.

Don't knock someone elses choice. Not everybody wants to fly off 20 ft jumps at 50 mph, some of us just want to ride and not worry about keeping the front end down, or having an engine problem 15 miles from the truck.

Lighten up ya'll.

Posted by: redhornet

Being fairly new to the sport, and the proud owner of a 07 400ex, I am curious as to why there is so much emphasis on racing and head-to-head speed on these boards. If you want to race back and forth up sand dunes or down a flat drag strip, go buy the fastest quad you can find and you can fluff your tail feathers in everybodies face. Who fricken cares how fast you can go in a straight line?

Buy the quad you need for the type of riding you'll do. If you ride trails like me, get a 400ex or a Z400, if you want to race, buy the race ready quads. If you just want to show off, buy the biggest quad you can find, mod the heck out of it and watch your dollars float away with your dragstrip wins.

Comparing head to head speed in quads that are designed for different tasks is like comparing an F-150 to a BMW M3.

Lets get real people.


Posted by: redhornet

Quote

Originally posted by: EVMAN
straight line speed i do not care about the top speed of my ATV i do not care what it is as long as i can keep up with everyone else which i do not have a problem with, me and my cousin ride almost every day he has the ltr 450 and his quad has never made it up any hill that mine has not. I have made it up hills my first try that took him twice 3 times which says i have pleanty of power. ME and him are always saying whoes the best why is mine good and why his is good. I never said mine was the fastest either i know mine definetily is not the fastest we raced several times i got close a couple of times but his is just to fast. But all i can tell you is when me and him and alot of other people on a variety of quads are riding we are always having to stop and wait for them and most of them have 700 raptors and 450's And dont tell me about I have made it up hils that raptors cannot get up my friend went up it and couldnt get up it so i dont know wut your talking about the raptor is the best impossible to beat. i am simply telling you wut i have beet and what i havent beat. And with the horspower . instead of talking crap why dont you just go look it up it is not hard those facts i put are all acurate you can find them all if you look 5 minutes on the internet if ya just took the time. SO why dont you all go do some reaserch on the 06 400ex look up all the parts and read about them learn about that exact quad and then come back and talk to me when you know what you are talking about


Again, my point is....if you want to ride with many other people of varying degrees of skill and machine, don't buy a 400ex or plan on modding the heck out of it, or buy the biggest fastest quad you can find.

I bought my ex for its reliability and overall ability to handle anything I can throw at it. If I find myself trying to keep up with others, I'll get a faster quad. If you are waiting for people on 400ex's to catch up to you, then they need to find new riding partners.

My whole point is that to argue about who is faster than who when your comparing apples to oranges is school yard stuff.





Posted by: JohnRogers

I don't have much experience with ATV's but I just bought one and while asking around and all, most pointed me in the direction of the Z400. Even the sales guy did. Basically said it was the best bang for your dollar. I paid right at $6000 for mine.

Posted by: TheRaptor700Rider

Quote

Originally posted by: Yoshiequipped
Quote

Originally posted by: Chipper00792
what do u think the top speed of the 2007 400ex would be if it was stock?


the top speed on my 05 400ex was about 73-75 mph. thats layed over the gas tank complaetly wound out, i dont weight but 140 pounds so that gives it a little more speed right there. now with my pipe and fully broke in motor i have been clocked at 80 on my new one and 85 goin down hill on my first 05 which blew flames out both sides about 10 feet long while trail riding. (honda dealership didnt put the oil line on the top of the motor on all the way and it blew it back off and ignited the oil) scariest experience in my life!


Bullsh*t buddy. 450s stock go into the 70's, not a 400ex. I hate people who over hype every damn thing they say. Read a couple magazines buddy. I'd trust them over anything you have to say after that dream you had about going 75 with a 400ex.


Posted by: yz426ex

EX.

Out on the same track the raptors frame kept cracking. The ex frame still looks perfect.

Posted by: miller3103

I agree with everyone on the 400ex. I ride an 03 and the other day we went trail riding and then we hit the asphault highway and raced. The Z400 (05 model), DS650, 400ex w/ 440 big bore, and my 400. everyone of them stock (except the 4--ex with the big bore) this is how we ended up. 1st - DS650,2nd- 440,3rd-Z400, and last by ALOT was me on my ex. The exs are GREAT trail riding quads but you have to spend alot of money to get them to even compete with the other quads. I bought mine just for trailing not for racing so im fine with the way mine performs. The only thing that im doing to mine is putting an HMF Sport Series Slip-On just to give it some sound. Im not too worried about the big power gains. If I was looking to buy on today to race or just for more power I would go with the Z400. It and the Big Bore 440 ran a VERY close race. The DS650 is a very fast quad but just too big for my taste but t rides very comfortable for that big of a quad. As big as it is he could spin it around on the trails just us with ouur 400s. Well I just thought that I would out in my 2cents.

Posted by: deezna

ok, I have a 2005 honda 400 ex and it's pushing 65 top speed and that's on pavement. They wont do 75 stock unless you got a different sprocket and maybe taller rear tires. Also I would take the honda 400 over a suzuki anyday of the week. The Z maybe be overall faster but the Honda seems to have better torque and much better for trails and it's also a much more durable machine.

Posted by: EVMAN

dude are you smoking the 400ex stock top speed is 76mph that is what the manfacture even says it is. And the ds 650 is not better it is a really good dune machine but other then that it takes the rest of that power that it has to pull around its almost 500 pound body. when the 400ex only weighs 378. Also the top speed of the 450er is 83mph out of the box not barely 70mph SRY buddy your wrong.......

Posted by: EVMAN

I do not know where you read that the 400ex barely hits 50mph the honda 250 top speed is beetween 50-55 mph how is a 400ex slower then that even my little cousins 150cc hammerhead go-cart does 42 mph stock and they just put on tones of aftermarket parts it i probally doin close to 50 mph right now and it only has a 3 gear fully auto engine so i think you should do a little more research like i have done and everyone i have talk to even the proffesionals at dealers said that it was around 76mph dont believe me look it up on the internet.

Posted by: EVMAN

dude wut the hell is your problem i bet you have never tried a 400ex in your life yo probally just like spitting out random crap that you dont even nooooooo. I have beaten a 660 raptor in a drag a banshee in a drag, a Z in a drag, and i have beat all of those quads in hill climbing my quad is not stock but even if it was there is no way those quads would out run me the only quad that i have raced with my sis stock 400ex is the Z and he was about 30 pounds lighter then me and i beat him on a drag by about 2 quad lengths. I also went riding with him a weak later and he couldnt make it up lots of the hills i could he ran out of power. So you may be able to talk sh*t but you can definetely not back it up IF you want to watch a Z and a 400ex race go to google and type in 400ex vs ltz400 it is at the very bottom of the page . sry biotch ttyl byybyyy now hahhhhhaahahah.

Posted by: EVMAN

ok well i raced a stock 06 400ex against my friends Z and beat him by about 2 quad leanghts i weigh about 30 more pounds then him and we are pretty much equally mached at riding i have watched several videos of the honda winning almost everytime out of like 12 videos the Z won like 3 time the rest honda just type in 400ex vs ltz400 on google go to the bottom of the page and click where it says honda 400ex vs ltz400 video sand drags and tell me which one wins ok its not that hard alrighty then byyyyyyyy now......

Posted by: EVMAN

Actually ya i beat the 660 raptor several time no problem also i beat the almost stock banshee just had pipes on it banshee a couple of times in a sand drag banshee definetilly not as fast as the 450's which is what i ride with all the time and i dont know what your talking about not enough power stock has 27 rear horsepower alreaty pleanty of power to do pretty much everything MIne has a cdi rev box 5 horspower gain + 1200rpm dmc comp 4 full exhaust,with end cap off 6-7 horspower.Weight Reductions, fmf power up jets ,uni airfilter, K&N extreme power lid, white brother airbox vents 7 horspower so total of 18 horspower give or take a few added on so 27+18= 45 horsepower give or take a few which the 450r honda is 37 rear horspower stock YFZ 36 rear horspower ad LTR 32 horsepower Banshee stock 37 horspower Stock 660 raptor 35.5 rear horspower. Stock 700 raptor 42 rear horsepower. Even go look them up by yourself if ya dont believe me. SO why dont you go think of some more crap about honda write me back and we will do this all over again. I also see you are brand loyal to yamaha. And that you think honda sucks well why dont ya go look at some videos of the yfz 450 and the honda 450 and tell me the last time yamaha has won against honda in proffesional racing. Never mind ill tell you they have not won any major event since 2004. Hondatook everything until 2006 when ltr came out then that started winning alot of races as well Honda also won baja 1000 i dont think yamaha took 1 race. And the basnshee is a dinasaur has been around to long used to be the best but now 4-strokes have taken over. 450's are the fastest and best race bikes now thats why they dont race the banshee any more ohwel sry ok ttyl byyyyyyyyyy now!

Posted by: EVMAN

straight line speed i do not care about the top speed of my ATV i do not care what it is as long as i can keep up with everyone else which i do not have a problem with, me and my cousin ride almost every day he has the ltr 450 and his quad has never made it up any hill that mine has not. I have made it up hills my first try that took him twice 3 times which says i have pleanty of power. ME and him are always saying whoes the best why is mine good and why his is good. I never said mine was the fastest either i know mine definetily is not the fastest we raced several times i got close a couple of times but his is just to fast. But all i can tell you is when me and him and alot of other people on a variety of quads are riding we are always having to stop and wait for them and most of them have 700 raptors and 450's And dont tell me about I have made it up hils that raptors cannot get up my friend went up it and couldnt get up it so i dont know wut your talking about the raptor is the best impossible to beat. i am simply telling you wut i have beet and what i havent beat. And with the horspower . instead of talking crap why dont you just go look it up it is not hard those facts i put are all acurate you can find them all if you look 5 minutes on the internet if ya just took the time. SO why dont you all go do some reaserch on the 06 400ex look up all the parts and read about them learn about that exact quad and then come back and talk to me when you know what you are talking about

Posted by: EVMAN

i thought about getting the 450 but i realy liked the reverse and a couple of my friends had the 400 and it is easily campariable when you put mods on it and i wanted a quad that would last forever withought having any problems that was the only reason i did not get a bigger bike so i can put mods on this bike and dont have to worry about it breaking.

Posted by: EVMAN

ok well either i am an extremely good rider to beat all of these people or i have a good bike or both and yes me and my cousin dust all of these people when we go on trips i think that it is both skill and the bike but i think it is 50/50 all i know is what do you have to compare it to if i can go up every hill i attempt or am just riding with everyone else and i always get ahead i dont like being in the middle i have to be in the very back or front. if i get in front i forget theres people behind me and we are soon split up because i go to fast. Even on fast rides i always stay in the back so that i let everyone else on the 450 banshee and raptors go ahead and then i can catch up fast .so if those quads havent made it up hills that i have when me and my friends ride all time and i have beat them in races before and then you say it is imposible that is not true you need to learn a little more About the new 400ex or if ya live in california come and ride with us and i will show ya what i mean .Anyways i am done talkin about this subject its getting pretty old and boring so lets find somthing else to talk about.Hey do you know if there is a way to put pictures on this i ave some cool PICS. to show of me doin some cool hills that i climb all the time?

Posted by: EVMAN

A raptor with a r1 engine dood that would be horrible at the climb of hill climbing that i do it would just spin back tires and grab and flip it and roll down the hill

Posted by: EVMAN

HEY RAPTOR 13 , 10 to 13 wow you are probely an immiture 40 year old virgin who smokes in his room all day. Why dont you learn what you are TALKING ABOUT BEFORE YOU TYPE IN ALL OF THIS SHI* IN ALRIGHT SEE LATER BITC*

Posted by: colbyland91

i have a 400ex and my brother has a raptor and when we ride on trails the raptor wants yo shut down it hates going slow but the ex will just go tough them no problem. well whatever you get i hope ur happy with it. Peace

Posted by: squirterboy

Quote

Originally posted by: duneracer500
Thats nothing guys. Listen to this funny load of bull.

In that ATV Source Forum, I had a guy tell me his KFX 700 could run 85 stock. Then, he told me his buddy had a banshee that would do over 100. I was wanting to talk to guys knowledgeable of atv's, that right there made me change my forum. Even though, after I corrected the little weasel everyone went killer on me and they all ganged up on me telling me I didn't know what I was talking about.

Thankfully, I found this forum where people who know their abc's to atv forums.


my uncle gets around 106 mph on his banshee so it dusnt surprise me



Posted by: mako30515

ok i have a 2005 trx400ex in yellow and i put that atv into alot of thing and roll down a 20ft hill and it still run like it was new....am not a big fan with yahama ya they go fast but they are not well mad .. i have a friend that has a 700 yahama 06 and it not workin well when he frist got it and mine still run like its new so if i was u i would get a honda am about to get a 450r honda soon a 400 is good but i need seed....

Posted by: Whip

i have done nothing to the gearing on my 400 and it has been clocked doing 80 MPH.

Posted by: Whip

my 400 has been clocked doing 80 so maybe your mods werent so respectable.

Posted by: Mr. Exceptional

get the ex

Posted by: honda400_06

man look i got a stock 06 400 and i have had mine at 74 and it wasn't maxing out but the 400 is the best sounds better and looks better the 660 is faster but not as good as the 400 and the 400 rides better