Pages: 1
Posted by: rescuediver
I too would go with the Mojave. It is a great quad. Has decent power and can be modified easily. Sounds like the one you found is just thatThey are easy to work on too.
Posted by: 86LT250RFatty
The mojave's are pretty peppy machines man! i mean, their 250cc, Liquid cooled, DOHC, 4-valve per cylinder. thats features found on top of the line bikes!
Posted by: Vunit
Mojave for sure...that mojave sounds pretty sweet..i wouldnt pass that up...they are fast quads too for a 250....youll really like it if you get it...how much they want for it???i should get it...lol...just messing
Posted by: Vunit
yep
Posted by: Vunit
4 strokes are alot better than 2 strokes...i mean they will last forever if you take care of them...and you dont have to rebuild them every few years...why do you think yamaha are everyone is starting to stop making 2 stroke quads...there is only like 1-2 years until the blaster is gone....4 stroke are taken over and have the power now a dayz of a 2 stroke...and they are great quad for the track and GNCC racing...lots of low end torque...im not saying i hate blaster but in this case the mojave would be the smarter way to go....
Posted by: DirtRyder420
hmm seems like kinda a toss up to me, on one hand you got a pretty cool lil blaster that already has some good performance parts on it, but the Mojave sounds nice also especially that works suspension .. if you dont mind spending time working on something and your lookin to build a kickass quad id stick with the blaster after market parts are endless n cheap and you can build it to be as nasty as you want but if you want a low mantaince reliable quad to ride for a few years and then upgrade to a better one id say the kawi ...jus my opinion
to bad you cant have both
Posted by: crazybmxrider
ok i found a kawasaki mojave 250 but i have no experience with them. i want to kno whick would be better. to keep my 96 blaster with reed spacer, fatboy2 silencer, aluminum rear wheels, front and rear lowering kit, k&n clamp on air filter, terry cable throttle, aluminum grab bar, and dg fdront bumper. or to sell that and get the 250 with white bros e series pipe, maier rear fenders, race cut front fenders, new itp wheels on front and back, new x drive 6 ply tires front and back, new front and back sunstar sprockets, new ek o ring chain, dg aluminum grab bar, new twin air filter, moose alloy bars and grips, moose carb kit, baja swing arm skid plate, and a new works performance rear shock with remote reservoir.
Posted by: Storj
the mojave is 4stroke right?
Posted by: Storj
then i would stick with the blaster
Posted by: Storj
Quote
Originally posted by: Vunit
4 strokes are alot better than 2 strokes...i mean they will last forever if you take care of them...and you dont have to rebuild them every few years...why do you think yamaha are everyone is starting to stop making 2 stroke quads...there is only like 1-2 years until the blaster is gone....4 stroke are taken over and have the power now a dayz of a 2 stroke...and they are great quad for the track and GNCC racing...lots of low end torque...im not saying i hate blaster but in this case the mojave would be the smarter way to go....
the reason there are doing away with the two strokes is because of emisions (sry i cant spell)
