Pages: 1
Posted by: TrailBreaker70
I just got a 2001 Warrior. I love it. It was between that and the 300EX. I wanted mo-power. I'm only 5'10" and the 300 just felt too small. Mine is great on trails. I haven't taken it through any mud yet, but everywhere else it does great. It has more than enough power for me.
Posted by: TrailBreaker70
Don't let anybody tell you that there is only a 2 mph difference in top speed between the Warrior and the 300ex either. My Warrior runs dead even with a Scrambler 500 2x4 with me (135 lbs.) on the Scrambler and my brother (240 lbs.) on the Warrior. I would imagine about 64 or 65 also.
Posted by: Coyotechaser
The Warrior has been out for so long that you should be able to find one within any price range. The top speed stock is around 61mph. It is a little heavy for a 350cc at around 400lbs. If your used to something lighter then the weight would be noticeable. It is compared to the 300EX alot. It has a more sit back feeling. It takes slightly more effort to stand while riding. Try sitting on a couple different quads to see the difference.
Posted by: Coyotechaser
Stock 300EX 54/55mph and the Warrior 60/61 mph. The 400EX is around 64/65mph stock.
Posted by: Aguywhocanneverbuyagoodquad
Yo, The Warriors are pretty good I am about to get a 1999 in about a week or two. You will find this quad really fun and plus it has the 6th gear and it can go about 65mph stock, I am not pretty sure of it, but i am positive
Posted by: matt2490
also what do you guys/girls think about warriors. and since i am on a tight budget i am looking for the early to late 90's. what are the pluses and minuses of the warrior? does it handle well?what is the top speed of a stock warrior? what kind of atv would you compare it with? thanks for your input.
Posted by: matt2490
thanks for your help,
matt
